“Whether you like Corrupt James Comey or not, and I cant imagine too many people liking him, HE LIED! It is not a complex lie, its a very simple, but IMPORTANT one. There is no way he can explain his way out of it. He is a Dirty Cop, and always has been, but he was just assigned a Crooked Joe Biden appointed Judge, so hes off to a very good start. Nevertheless, words are words, and he wasnt hedging or in dispute. He was very positive, there was no doubt in his mind about what he said, or meant by saying it. He left himself ZERO margin of error on a big and important answer to a question. He just got unexpectedly caught. James Dirty Cop Comey was a destroyer of lives. He knew exactly what he was saying, and that it was a very serious and far reaching lie for which a very big price must be paid! President DJT” @realDonaldTrump

Fact-Check Summary

Donald Trump’s social media post about James Comey’s indictment contains a mix of accurate facts, exaggerated rhetoric, and misleading characterizations. Factually, Comey was indicted on two charges, including making false statements to Congress and obstruction, related to 2020 Senate testimony. He was assigned a judge appointed by President Biden. However, the claims that Comey is a “dirty cop,” a “destroyer of lives,” and that there is no room for doubt or alternative explanation are political opinions, not established facts. Internal Justice Department records indicate that career prosecutors opposed the charges, citing insufficient evidence for criminal intent or perjury—which contradicts the certainty and criminal labeling expressed in the post.

 

Belief Alignment Analysis

The post employs divisive, inflammatory language that undermines civil, constructive public discourse and disrespects democratic institutions. The use of terms like “dirty cop,” “destroyer of lives,” and “crooked judge” constitutes ad hominem attacks, not reasoned critique. These rhetorical choices foster polarization and diminish public trust in the legal process and the principle of presumption of innocence. Such language is inconsistent with democratic values of civility, inclusion, and factual reasoning, disregarding the complexity and procedural legitimacy inherent to the justice system.

 

Opinion

The post’s certainty about Comey’s guilt, coupled with hostile labeling, lacks supporting evidence and fails to acknowledge procedural norms or the perspectives of career prosecutors who found the evidence insufficient. Such rhetoric is not only misleading but also corrosive to faith in democratic institutions. While the core events referenced are grounded in fact, the framing is more propagandistic than reasoned, elevating opinion above principle and widening divisions.

 

TLDR

James Comey was indicted on two federal charges and was assigned a Biden-appointed judge, as stated. However, claims about his guilt, corruption, and lack of any doubt are political opinion and hyperbole. The post undermines constructive and fair discourse by resorting to divisive and unsupported character attacks.

 

Claim: James Comey is a “dirty cop” who committed an obvious, serious lie, has no possible defense, and is being protected by a “Biden appointed judge.”

Fact: Comey was indicted on two counts related to false statements and obstruction. Judge Michael Nachmanoff, a Biden appointee, was randomly assigned. Whether Comey is guilty or acted with corrupt intent is not established; career prosecutors concluded the evidence was not clear-cut. The justice process is ongoing and presumption of innocence applies.

Opinion: The post’s certainty about Comey’s “guilt” and character vilification are unsupported by official findings and reflect personal animus and political narrative rather than fact.

TruthScore: 4

True: Comey was indicted, and a Biden-appointed judge is assigned to his case.

Hyperbole: Descriptions such as “destroyer of lives,” “dirty cop,” and the claim that there is “zero margin of error” or no explanation for Comey’s actions.

Lies: The implication that guilt is legally established, or that Judge Nachmanoff’s appointment ensures protection or undermines the process.