“SNAP BENEFITS, which increased by Billions and Billions of Dollars (MANY FOLD!) during Crooked Joe Bidens disastrous term in office (Due to the fact that they were haphazardly handed to anyone for the asking, as opposed to just those in need, which is the purpose of SNAP!), will be given only when the Radical Left Democrats open up government, which they can easily do, and not before! Thank you for your attention to this matter. President DJT” @realDonaldTrump

Fact-Check Summary

The post claims that SNAP benefits increased dramatically (“billions and billions of dollars, many fold”) under President Biden through indiscriminate distribution and that benefits will resume only if Democrats reopen the government. Factually, SNAP spending did increase by tens of billions during Biden’s term, primarily due to COVID-19 emergency allotments (which began under Trump and were extended under Biden) and a 21% increase following the Thrifty Food Plan reevaluation. However, permanent “many fold” increases are overstated, and the program retained income and asset tests—benefits were never “haphazardly handed to anyone.” As of the post, court orders had already required continued partial SNAP payment during the 2025 shutdown, contradicting the assertion that no benefits would be distributed until Democrats acted.

Belief Alignment Analysis

The post features divisive rhetoric (“Crooked Joe Biden,” “Radical Left Democrats”) and inflames rather than informs. It exaggerates policy effects and misrepresents eligibility, undermining reasoned democratic debate. The framing places blame and purposefully simplifies complex legislative and administrative realities, departing from norms of civil, inclusive discourse and accurate information essential for fair public reasoning.

Opinion

While SNAP spending did grow considerably for documented reasons, the “many fold” language is inaccurate as a description of policy-driven benefit levels, and the portrayal of open-ended, indiscriminate distribution is false. The shutdown blame assignment omits legal and procedural realities. Good-faith democratic discourse requires precise claims and rejection of hyperbolic demonization in policy argumentation.

TLDR

SNAP spending rose largely due to temporary pandemic policies, not permanent, indiscriminate giveaways. Eligibility rules stayed targeted. The claim that no benefits would be paid until Democrats ended the shutdown was already false by court order. The post relies on exaggeration and divisive framing at odds with facts and constructive debate.

Claim: SNAP benefits exploded many fold during Biden by being handed to anyone, and will only resume if Democrats end the shutdown.

Fact: SNAP spending increased largely due to pandemic-related emergency policies (starting under Trump, extended under Biden) and a one-time 21% benefit increase. Eligibility remained targeted to need. Court orders compelled continued partial benefit payments during the 2025 shutdown.

Opinion: The post exaggerates permanent policy impacts, misrepresents eligibility, and uses inflammatory language that detracts from reasoned civic dialogue.

TruthScore: 3

True: Overall SNAP spending did rise by tens of billions between 2019 and 2023, with a permanent 21% increase in average benefits.

Hyperbole: “Many fold” increases, description of benefits as “haphazardly handed to anyone,” and partisan language blaming only Democrats for the shutdown.

Lies: That SNAP would be withheld entirely until Democrats ended the shutdown, given existing court orders requiring partial payments.