“Please be informed that we will no longer let the American Public be ripped off by Credit Card Companies that are charging Interest Rates of 20 to 30%, and even more, which festered unimpeded during the Sleepy Joe Biden Administration. AFFORDABILITY! Effective January 20, 2026, I, as President of the United States, am calling for a one year cap on Credit Card Interest Rates of 10%. Coincidentally, the January 20th date will coincide with the one year anniversary of the historic and very successful Trump Administration. Thank you for your attention to this matter. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN! PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP” @realDonaldTrump

Fact-Check Summary

President Trump’s claim of calling for a one-year cap on credit card interest rates at 10%, effective January 20, 2026, is factually correct as a stated intent and aligns with current reports. His assertion that credit card interest rates currently range from 20% to 30% or higher is substantiated by data from the Federal Reserve and Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. However, attributing these high rates solely to the Biden Administration oversimplifies the causes, which primarily involve Federal Reserve policy rather than direct presidential action. The post lacks details on legal and procedural pathways needed to implement such a cap, which remains unaddressed and faces significant hurdles.

Belief Alignment Analysis

While the post reflects a concern for consumer hardship and highlights an important policy issue, the language (“Sleepy Joe Biden Administration,” “ripped off,” and campaign slogans) injects partisan rhetoric and divisiveness. This framing detracts from constructive democratic discourse by blaming without considering the complex policy mechanisms involved. The absence of substantive details on implementation also undermines transparency and public reason.

Opinion

The accurate elements concerning current interest rates and the policy proposal are offset by oversimplifications and a lack of procedural clarity. The framing is partisan and distracts from nuanced civic debate. Fact-based analysis is crucial when discussing finance and regulatory policy, as simplistic blame undermines public trust.

TLDR

Trump’s statement about high credit card interest rates and his proposal for a cap is mostly factual. However, he misattributes blame for high rates to the Biden administration and omits the legal and procedural complexities necessary for implementation. The language is divisive and partially misleading.

Claim: Trump will cap credit card interest rates at 10% starting January 20, 2026, because rates of 20-30% increased under Biden’s administration, which let it happen unimpeded.

Fact: The proposal for a 10% cap is real and accurately described, and current credit card rates do average 20% to over 30% depending on the card. Blaming the Biden administration directly is misleading; the increase is mainly due to Federal Reserve policy decisions on interest rates, not direct presidential action or inaction.

Opinion: The announcement combines valid grievance and policy aims with overly simplistic, partisan rhetoric, omitting essential context about implementation challenges and legislative necessity.

TruthScore: 7

True: There is a stated 10% cap proposal; current rates are accurately described; the date references are correct.

Hyperbole: Attribution of blame solely to the Biden administration, use of pejorative language, and ignoring the complexity of implementation.

Lies: None outright, but the post is misleading about both causes of rate increases and the ease of implementing a cap.