“Kamala Harris, who is DUMB AS A ROCK, is going around and using, as a standard part of her Speech on why she lost the Election, that 2024 was the closest Presidential Election in the 21st Century. Everyone knows this is a lie, and was covered as such by Fox News! I won the Electoral College, 312-226, a LANDSLIDE, Counties Nationwide, 2,600 to 525, a LANDSLIDE, all seven Swing States, a LANDSLIDE, and, despite the fact that Californias Fake Mail In Ballots came in at ridiculous numbers (It was RIGGED!), I still won the Popular Vote by MILLIONS! Bush, as an example, won the Election by 537 Votes, and many other Elections were very close. Kamalas closest in the 21st Century soundbite was, like everything else in the Democrat Party, A TOTAL LIE! I expect an apology. Thank you for your attention to this matter!” @realDonaldTrump

Fact-Check Summary

The post claims that Kamala Harris lied by calling the 2024 election the “closest presidential election in the 21st century” and asserts Donald Trump won a “landslide” in Electoral College, counties, swing states, and the popular vote. Factually, Harris’s statement is incorrect: the 2000 Bush-Gore race was much closer by every electoral measure. Trump’s labeling of his win as a “landslide” exaggerates the margin; a 1.48% popular vote victory and 312-226 electoral margin are competitive but do not meet historical criteria for a landslide. The claim of a rigged or fraudulent process in California’s mail-in ballots is not substantiated by credible evidence and misleads the public about the legitimacy of the election.

Belief Alignment Analysis

The post relies on derogatory language and personal insults against Kamala Harris, undermining civil and inclusive discourse. It employs inflammatory and divisive rhetoric, especially regarding election integrity, without factual basis. This form of communication does not support democratic norms, as it fosters distrust and polarization. Respect for election outcomes and avoidance of unsubstantiated fraud claims are core to upholding democracy and public reason.

Opinion

Accurate democratic discourse demands careful acknowledgment of both the closeness and decisiveness of electoral outcomes. Both Harris and Trump overstated their cases: Harris by calling 2024 the closest race of the century, and Trump by describing his win as a landslide. Responsible public figures should avoid hyperbole and divisively charged language, especially on election legitimacy, to maintain faith in democratic institutions.

TLDR

2024 was not the closest election of the 21st century (2000 was closer) and not a landslide victory by historical standards. The post’s framing is misleading and does not uphold the standards of truth or constructive civic engagement.

Claim: Kamala Harris lied about the 2024 election being the closest of the 21st century; Trump won by a landslide; California’s mail-in ballots were rigged; Trump won the popular vote by millions.

Fact: The 2024 election was not the closest of the 21st century (2000 was closer). Trump’s win was clear but not a true landslide. There is no substantive evidence California’s mail-in ballots were rigged. Trump did win the popular vote by approximately 2.3 million, a modest margin in historical context.

Opinion: The post distorts election facts and relies on divisive rhetoric, diminishing public trust in democratic processes.

TruthScore: 3

True: Harris did inaccurately describe the 2024 election as the closest in the 21st century. Trump did win by millions in the popular vote and took all seven major swing states.

Hyperbole: Trump’s characterization of the results as a “landslide” and the suggestion of large-scale mail-in ballot fraud are exaggerated and misleading.

Lies: The implication that California’s mail-in ballots were “rigged” and that the 2024 race was a landslide are not supported by evidence or historical precedent.