Fact-Check Summary
The post includes a mix of factual assertions, exaggerations, and unsupported numerical claims. Trump and Sharpton have a well-documented, complex relationship spanning decades. The Tawana Brawley case was found by a grand jury to be a hoax, with Sharpton held civilly liable for defamation. Sharpton’s MSNBC show does have notably low ratings among cable news programs. However, specific claims about Sharpton seeking Trump for crowd size at rallies, the motivation for retaining Sharpton on television, and quantifiable network political coverage (“97% negative”) are unsubstantiated or misleading. The suggestion that NBC or ABC should have their licenses investigated for partisan content disregards regulatory specifics and constitutional protections.
Belief Alignment Analysis
The post employs derogatory language, partisan framing, and extreme statistical claims to undermine trust in individuals and institutions. Instead of advancing evidence-based, inclusive civic dialogue, it relies on unproven assertions and adversarial rhetoric that fosters division and erodes faith in democratic norms. Calls for government intervention against media organizations based on perceived bias risk crossing into authoritarian logic rather than supporting open debate or accountability through public reason.
Opinion
While some core statements—such as the historical aspects of the Trump-Sharpton relationship and the Brawley case findings—are backed by fact, the message is weighed down by distortions, exaggerated insults, and unsupported numerical claims. It would serve democracy better to engage in debate with respect for facts, complexity, and institutional legitimacy, rather than by attacking with divisive generalizations and hyperbole.
TLDR
Factually correct on a few historical details, but most claims are exaggerated or lack substantiation. The post’s language and framing undermine democratic norms and reasoned public discourse.
Claim: Sharpton was a “major Trump fan,” the Brawley case was a “hoax/scam,” Sharpton asked Trump to attend rallies for crowd size, his MSNBC show is kept on solely for political correctness, and both NBC and ABC are overwhelmingly biased with 97% negative Republican coverage.
Fact: Trump and Sharpton had a lengthy, complex relationship; the Brawley case was investigated and found not to be a crime, with Sharpton held liable for defamation; Sharpton’s show has low ratings; Brian Roberts is the chairman of Comcast/NBC. There is no evidence Sharpton was a “major fan,” that he asked Trump to rallies for crowds, that network programming is maintained for “political correctness,” or that coverage is 97% negative by objective measure.
Opinion: The post is a blend of selective historical accuracy and heavy partisan exaggeration. Its divisive, accusatory language does not advance civil, fact-based discourse.
TruthScore: 4
True: Trump and Sharpton knew each other well; Brawley case legal findings; Sharpton’s low TV ratings; Brian Roberts’ role.
Hyperbole: “Major TRUMP fan”; network ratings claims; motivations attributed to TV executives; calls for FCC action; “97% negative” coverage.
Lies: No verifiable evidence for Sharpton seeking Trump for crowd size, “almost exclusively positive Democrat content,” nor substantiated statistics on network coverage percentages.