“I have just viewed the clip of the event which took place in Minneapolis, Minnesota. It is a horrible thing to watch. The woman screaming was, obviously, a professional agitator, and the woman driving the car was very disorderly, obstructing and resisting, who then violently, willfully, and viciously ran over the ICE Officer, who seems to have shot her in self defense. Based on the attached clip, it is hard to believe he is alive, but is now recovering in the hospital. The situation is being studied, in its entirety, but the reason these incidents are happening is because the Radical Left is threatening, assaulting, and targeting our Law Enforcement Officers and ICE Agents on a daily basis. They are just trying to do the job of MAKING AMERICA SAFE. We need to stand by and protect our Law Enforcement Officers from this Radical Left Movement of Violence and Hate! PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP” @realDonaldTrump

Fact-Check Summary

The post’s narrative regarding the Minneapolis ICE shooting distorts key facts. Video evidence, eyewitness statements, and Minneapolis law enforcement officials refute claims that the woman “violently willfully and viciously ran over the ICE Officer” or that deadly force was used in clear self-defense. The victim was a legal observer, not a “professional agitator,” and there is no substantiated evidence she targeted officers. Reported increases in attacks on ICE agents are exaggerated in the post, and the hospitalization status of the officer remains unconfirmed by official sources.

Belief Alignment Analysis

The post uses hyperbolic, divisive rhetoric that undermines civil discourse. It lacks constructive engagement with the complexities of the situation, disregards the presumption of innocence, and publicly mischaracterizes an unarmed victim engaging in lawful activity. Such framing threatens inclusive democratic values and displays a willingness to distort facts to promote a politically polarizing narrative, compromising public reason and the principle of fairness.

Opinion

This post prioritizes inflammatory and misleading language over factual accuracy. Rather than fostering constructive public conversation or respect for evidence, it selectively amplifies an unsubstantiated account that is contradicted by officials and eyewitnesses. This approach endangers public trust in both legal processes and democratic dialogue.

TLDR

The post’s main factual claims are contradicted by evidence. The incident was not as described, the victim was not a “professional agitator,” and assertions of daily violent targeting of law enforcement are unsupported by available data. The language and narrative undermine trust and democratic civility.

Claim: The woman “violently willfully and viciously ran over the ICE Officer” who shot her in self-defense; she was a professional agitator; officer is recovering in hospital; these incidents are daily due to the Radical Left targeting law enforcement.

Fact: Video evidence and local officials confirm the woman did not run over officers; she was trying to flee and was shot while unarmed. She was a legal observer, not a professional agitator. No evidence supports officer hospitalization or the existence of daily attacks as claimed.

Opinion: The post misstates events and uses divisive rhetoric undermining democratic and civic norms, relying on exaggeration over fact.

TruthScore: 1

True: The woman was shot by an ICE agent and the officer is alive.

Hyperbole: Claims of daily targeting of officers, labeling the victim a “professional agitator,” and characterizing the event as “vicious” or “willful” violence by the victim.

Lies: The woman “ran over” the officer; that she attacked law enforcement; unsubstantiated hospitalization details; and exaggerated claims of orchestrated Radical Left violence.