“I cant believe ABC Fake News gave Jimmy Kimmel his job back. The White House was told by ABC that his Show was cancelled! Something happened between then and now because his audience is GONE, and his talent was never there. Why would they want someone back who does so poorly, whos not funny, and who puts the Network in jeopardy by playing 99% positive Democrat GARBAGE. He is yet another arm of the DNC and, to the best of my knowledge, that would be a major Illegal Campaign Contribution. I think were going to test ABC out on this. Lets see how we do. Last time I went after them, they gave me $16 Million Dollars. This one sounds even more lucrative. A true bunch of losers! Let Jimmy Kimmel rot in his bad Ratings.” @realDonaldTrump

Fact-Check Summary

The post combines some factual assertions about Jimmy Kimmel’s suspension and reinstatement at ABC, his ratings decline, and a financial settlement with ABC, but mixes these with exaggerations and unsupported claims. Kimmel was indeed suspended and later reinstated following controversy over his statements; his show’s ratings have declined substantially, and ABC did settle a lawsuit with Trump for $15 million (not $16 million as claimed). The post’s claims regarding White House involvement, labeling Kimmel as an illegal campaign contribution, and insinuations of criminality are not supported by factual reporting or legal precedent.

 

Belief Alignment Analysis

This post uses derogatory and divisive rhetoric, exaggerates factual claims, and makes unsubstantiated accusations of illegality. Rather than fostering civil discourse or constructive criticism, it seeks to undermine trust in news media and in the legitimacy of media and entertainment figures through ad hominem attacks and misleading framing. The post does not align with democratic values of truthfulness, inclusion, or respect for institutions, but instead relies on inflammatory language and polarization.

 

Opinion

While dissatisfaction with programming or public figures is legitimate, claims must be grounded in evidence and communicated civilly to contribute constructively to public discourse. The post’s hyperbolic accusations and personal attacks undermine healthy democratic engagement.

 

TLDR

Jimmy Kimmel was suspended and later brought back to ABC amid controversy, and the program’s ratings have dropped sharply. A $15 million, not $16 million, settlement with Trump occurred. Claims about White House communications and campaign finance violations are unfounded. The post exaggerates and distorts several facts while using divisive rhetoric.

 

Claim: ABC gave Jimmy Kimmel his job back after telling the White House his show was cancelled; his ratings are gone; ABC is acting as an arm of the DNC in violation of campaign finance law; Trump previously received $16 million from ABC in settlement.

Fact: ABC reinstated Kimmel after a brief suspension; ratings have indeed declined by about 45% in recent years. There is no evidence ABC communicated directly with the White House about canceling the show, nor is there any credible basis to claim the program constitutes an illegal campaign contribution. The lawsuit settled for $15 million, not $16 million.

Opinion: The post contains a factual core but heavily exaggerates, distorts, and mixes facts with baseless allegations and hostile rhetoric, undercutting meaningful discourse.

TruthScore: 4

True: Kimmel’s recent suspension and reinstatement at ABC; significant ratings decline; ABC paid a large legal settlement to Trump (amount misstated).

Hyperbole: Claims that Kimmel’s audience is entirely “gone,” that he “puts the network in jeopardy,” and that ABC is an “arm of the DNC” making illegal contributions.

Lies: That ABC informed the White House of a show cancellation and that the Kimmel program is a “major illegal campaign contribution.” $16 million figure is inaccurate.