“The Orthodox Jewish communities all across America voted in very big numbers for me in our Historic 2024 Presidential Campaign. Lakewood, New Jersey, was one of our biggest Wins anywhere in the Country with more than 90% of the Vote. On November 4th, the eyes of the Country are on New Jersey again. I need ALL of my supporters in the Orthodox community in Lakewood and its surrounding towns to vote in HUGE numbers for Jack Ciattarelli. Jack will be a GREAT Governor, and has my Complete and Total Endorsement — He will never let you down! Jack needs every single Vote in the community, including all the Yeshiva students who turned out to vote for me last year. Your Votes in this Election will save New Jersey, a State that is near and dear to my heart. Jack will cut your taxes, and tremendously reduce your out of control and ridiculous Energy costs — whereas his opponent will double, triple, and even quadruple your Energy, and other costs. You will rue the day that you voted for her. VOTE FOR JACK CIATTARELLI ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 4TH!” @realDonaldTrump

Fact-Check Summary

The post accurately reflects Donald Trump’s strong support among Orthodox Jewish communities and confirms his endorsement of Jack Ciattarelli. However, it exaggerates the percentage of the vote Trump received in Lakewood, NJ, and misrepresents the opponent’s energy cost policies. Factual inaccuracies and significant hyperbole undermine its credibility, especially regarding claims of opponent-induced energy cost increases.

Belief Alignment Analysis

This post blends legitimate political advocacy and endorsement with divisive rhetoric and exaggeration. While expressing support for a candidate is appropriate in democratic discourse, false statistics and hyperbolic depictions of the opponent’s policies detract from fact-based, respectful dialogue. The language employed risks fostering polarization and undermines public trust in civic debate by presenting campaign promises as certain outcomes and opponents’ intentions as extreme threats.

Opinion

While enthusiasm for political candidates and policy agendas is a core part of democratic expression, it is essential that claims—particularly numerical results and policy impacts—are conveyed with accuracy and proportionality. Selective exaggeration, especially when paired with derogatory language about an opponent’s policies, does not align with best practices in public, democratic discourse.

TLDR

Trump’s post gets the broad trends right—his strong support among Orthodox Jewish voters and his endorsement of Ciattarelli—but inflates his Lakewood vote percentage and uses misleading, exaggerated language about his opponent’s policy effects. The claim is compromised by factual errors and hyperbole.

Claim: Orthodox Jewish voters overwhelmingly backed Trump (with >90% in Lakewood), and Jack Ciattarelli will reduce taxes and energy costs while his opponent would massively increase them.

Fact: Trump received 87.7%—not over 90%—of Lakewood’s vote. Ciattarelli’s platform includes tax and energy cost reductions; Sherrill’s does not explicitly call for energy price increases, and instead proposes rate freezes.

Opinion: Advocacy and endorsement are valid, but exaggerating results and demonizing opponents with false claims does not promote informed, democratic decision-making.

TruthScore: 5

True: Orthodox Jewish communities gave Trump strong support, he endorsed Ciattarelli, and Ciattarelli proposes tax and energy cost cuts.

Hyperbole: Claims of more than 90% support in Lakewood and of the opponent “doubling, tripling, quadrupling” energy costs.

Lies: The specific vote figure cited for Lakewood, and the attribution of major energy cost increases to the opponent without factual basis.