“I will be interviewed on 60 Minutes right after the Kansas City / Buffalo NFL Football Game. Hopefully they will treat me as well as they did Kamala. Enjoy!” @realDonaldTrump

Fact-Check Summary

Donald Trump’s post announcing his 60 Minutes interview immediately following the Kansas City Chiefs vs. Buffalo Bills NFL game is factually correct. The interview did air as scheduled, and this marked Trump’s first 60 Minutes appearance in five years. His reference to Kamala Harris and CBS alludes to a prior $16 million settlement with CBS over disputed editing of a Harris interview, a controversy grounded in factual events.

Belief Alignment Analysis

The post is civil and essentially factual in its primary announcement. The reference to how Kamala Harris was treated reflects political rivalry and skepticism toward the media, which is a common theme in political discourse. It does not contain overtly divisive or inflammatory language, though it implies mistrust in journalistic fairness. The statement remains within the bounds of democratic debate without resorting to derogatory or exclusionary rhetoric.

Opinion

Trump’s statement about “treatment” on 60 Minutes versus Kamala Harris is clearly an opinion based on unresolved disputes about media fairness. However, the event details themselves are accurately presented. The post blends factual information with a subjective historical reference, which is typical in political communication but does not distort the primary facts at hand.

TLDR

Trump’s post is factually accurate about the timing and existence of his 60 Minutes interview. The remark about Kamala Harris is opinion rooted in a real, publicly known settlement, not fabrication.

Claim: Trump announced his interview on 60 Minutes would air right after the Kansas City-Buffalo NFL football game and referenced hopes for fair treatment compared to Kamala Harris.

Fact: The interview aired as stated following the Chiefs-Bills game. The comment about Kamala Harris references a documented legal settlement between Trump and CBS regarding editing of her interview.

Opinion: The implication about media fairness is a subjective interpretation and not a factual assertion about the upcoming interview.

TruthScore: 10

True: Timing and context of the 60 Minutes interview; existence of the previous legal dispute and settlement with CBS.

Hyperbole: Suggestion that Harris was especially favored is opinion and not definitively established by settled fact.

Lies: None detected.