“Why is FoxNews and Peter Doocy putting on Democrat Senator Mark Kelly to talk about, totally unabated or challenged, Healthcare? The FAKE SPIN is so bad for Republicans that it is hard to believe that we WIN. It will be very unfair, in the future, when they dont have TRUMP to fight for them. Therefore, we should fix it, NOW! Im watching this Interview. It just doesnt end. Fox should either get on board, or get off board, NOW, but at this point, it just doesnt make any difference to me. They suck up the Ratings because of us, and then spin them in the Democrats direction. They refuse to put up Polls that correctly show me at 65% in Popularity, a Republican RECORD, but if I have a fake bad Poll, many of which are done by Fox (One of the worst Pollsters out there is the FoxNews Poll), they put them up immediately, and with gusto. Republicans are so tired of this fight with Fox always trying to be so politically correct! Thank you for your attention to this matter.” @realDonaldTrump

Fact-Check Summary

The post makes multiple claims: that Fox News favors Democrats in coverage and polling, that Donald Trump holds a 65% approval (a Republican record), that Fox polls are unreliable or biased, and that Fox benefits from Trump in ratings while being politically correct. Reliable polling from multiple organizations shows Trump’s approval consistently below 50%, usually in the low-to-mid 40s. Fox News polling aligns with other major pollsters in methodology and results. Senator Mark Kelly has discussed healthcare policy but Fox News has provided counterarguments, not merely uncritical coverage. Fox News has benefited from covering Trump but maintains both positive and critical content. Overall, the post’s claims about polling and media bias are not supported by evidence.

Belief Alignment Analysis

This post undermines democratic discourse by advancing unsupported assertions, especially regarding polling and media bias, rather than engaging with factual debate. The language is divisive, presents opinion as fact, and promotes distrust in democratic and media institutions. Rather than fostering constructive, inclusive engagement, it resorts to inflammatory rhetoric that could erode public trust in core democratic processes.

Opinion

While media criticism is a legitimate aspect of free speech, claims regarding polling accuracy and personal popularity should be grounded in verifiable data. Dismissing unfavorable polls as “fake” or demanding media allegiance reduces trust and civility in public life. Vigorous debate should focus on evidence and promote public reason over division.

TLDR

Trump’s claim of a 65% approval rating is not supported by polling evidence, and his criticism of Fox News polls as “fake” lacks factual basis. While media tensions and disputes exist, the post’s use of hyperbole and divisive language undermines civil and democratic engagement.

Claim: Fox News is unfairly favoring Democrats, airing unchallenged interviews, uses fake or biased polls, and Trump’s popularity is at a record 65%.

Fact: Major polls show Trump’s approval rating below 50%. Fox News polls use bipartisan standard methodology and match peer results. Fox News coverage includes both positive and critical reporting on Trump and healthcare policy.

Opinion: The post exaggerates polling numbers, mischaracterizes media methodology, and employs divisive, nonconstructive rhetoric.

TruthScore: 2

True: Fox News covers Trump extensively and has high ratings.

Hyperbole: Claims of 65% approval as a “Republican record” and depictions of Fox as only serving Democrats.

Lies: Assertion that Trump’s approval is 65% and that Fox News polls are uniquely “fake” or problematic.